CX360v vs SR11

3D - HDR-TD10 (2011).
Professional models - HXR-NX70 (2011). HXR-MC2000, HXR-MC50 (2010).
Flash Memory / consumer - HDR-CX260V, HDR-CX580V, HDR-CX740VE, HDR-CX760V (2012). HDR-CX360V, HDR-CX560V, HDR-CX700V (2011). HDR-CX110, HDR-CX150, HDR-CX300, HDR-CX350V, HDR-CX550V (2010). HDR-CX100 (2009). HDR-CX12 (2008). HDR-CX7 (2007).
Hard Disk / consumer - HDR-XR260V (2012). HDR-XR150, HDR-XR350V, HDR-XR550V (2010). HDR-XR100, HDR-XR200, HDR-XR500, HDR-XR520 (2009). HDR-SR11, HDR-SR12 (2008). HDR-SR5, HDR-SR7 (2007).
Post Reply
6lbsoft
Posts: 3
Joined: 23 Jul 2012 00:07
Location: Southern California

CX360v vs SR11

Post by 6lbsoft »

Hi everyone this is my first posting so bare with me if I mess something up lol. I am looking at 2 camcorders both used for the same price. One is the older SR11 and the other is the CX360v. Now, memory capacity aside, which of these two camcorders puts out a better image? I looked at the differences: 1/3" CMOS for the SR11 and 1/4" BSI CMOS for the 360v, higher bitrate for the CX360v, etc.. I am leaning slightly towards the sr11 because of the nightshot capability but if the back side illuminated sensor of the 360v is as good as Sony claims then it should do a lot better in low light. I still am not sure between the two, anyone wanna put their 2 cents in?
User avatar
Stephan
Site Admin
Posts: 592
Joined: 20 Mar 2010 18:51
Location: Paris, France

Re: CX360v vs SR11

Post by Stephan »

Ordinarily larger sensor is better, but here... the SR1 is 3 years older, and things improve a lot in 3 years esp. with the latest generation sensors. I'd go with the latest 360V.
acgold7
Global Moderator
Posts: 400
Joined: 14 May 2010 23:03
Location: Woodinville, WA, USA
Contact:

Re: CX360v vs SR11

Post by acgold7 »

I think I'd tend to agree. Even with the bigger sensor of the older cam, I'd think recent improvements in sensor tech would give the newer cam a better pic.

And yet....

If you look at out HD1000 vs. MC2000 shoot-out, I think these are the exact same two chips we are talking abut. In that case, the older cam provided a better image. So maybe the newest isn't the greatest. Then again, the 360 touts the Exmor R sensor while the MC2000 doesn't, so they may not in fact be the same.
Adam
6lbsoft
Posts: 3
Joined: 23 Jul 2012 00:07
Location: Southern California

Re: CX360v vs SR11

Post by 6lbsoft »

Well what I did was buy both and I'm going to shoot them both in dark and light areas and see which one comes out on top. I also have a dsc-hx9v which has the 1/2 exmor r sensor and I do notice less noise in dark areas compared to what I see off of some people's YouTube videos shot with a sr11...
6lbsoft
Posts: 3
Joined: 23 Jul 2012 00:07
Location: Southern California

Re: CX360v vs SR11

Post by 6lbsoft »

Well Got the CX360V yesterday and instead of getting the SR11 I saved $70 and found a clean CX-12. The video was pretty much what I expected. The CX360V in low light is noticeably brighter and less grainy, but in daylight it's hard to notice a difference. I think for what i am using the camcorder for the CX-12 will do just fine. Not to mention the CX360v is flashing the E:91:01 error code haha, it's being sent back. But thank you everyone for your input, much appreciated =)
Post Reply